MEDIA MONITORING DATABASE
Journalist Haluk Kalafat – “Publicly insulting the Turkish nation (TCK 301/1)” case
RELATED PERSON OR INSTITUTION
Haluk Kalafat
CITY
İstanbul
LAST UPDATED
02/07/2024
TYPE OF STATEMENT
Political
MEDIUM
Internet
Internet News Portal
THE TITLE OF WHOSE RIGHT IS INTERFERED
Journalist
RIGHTS GUARANTEED UNDER THE RIGHT OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
Right to Impart Information and Ideas
TYPE OF INTERFERENCE
Judicial Interference
Criminal Courts
Decision of acquittal
THE LEGAL GROUNDS FOR INTERFERENCE
Turkish Penal Code
Art. 301

A lawsuit was filed against journalists Haluk Kalafat and Elif Akgül on the charge of “publicly insulting the Turkish nation (TCK 301/1)” for six news stories published on bianet in 2015, 2018 and 2019 (April 27).

At the hearing held on October 19, lawyer Veysel Ok said that the investigation started with a complaint made to CİMER in 2019 and said, “An investigation permit was requested from the Ministry of Justice in 2021. The indictment was prepared on December 9, 2021. The memorandum of agreement was drawn up in December 2022. Internet news sites were subject to the Press Law in October 2022. Therefore, the investigation has run out of time. “We demand that the client be given an immediate dismissal decision without taking their defense statements in the case,” he said.

Hearing prosecutor Mehmet Ateş requested the rejection of the request, stating that the statute of limitations will apply to online news sites as of October 2022. Judge Ali Çalı asked Akgül and Kalafat whether bianet is an official news organization and whether it has submitted a declaration to the prosecutor’s office. Journalists stated that they no longer work at bianet and said that they had no information about the issue. Thereupon, Judge Çalı rejected the request and started taking defenses against the indictment.

In his opinion, the prosecutor requested that Kalafat and Akgül be punished under TCK 301. Akgül and Kalafat then requested time to defend against the opinion. In line with the demands, the court decided to write a memorandum to the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office to ask whether bianet has filed a declaration of property and to investigate whether it qualifies as an online news site. The next hearing will be held on February 20, 2024 (October 19).

The third hearing of the trial of Kalafat and Akgül was held on February 20 at the Istanbul 2nd Criminal Court of First Instance. Journalists made their defenses against the prosecutor’s opinion on the merits of the case, for which he requested a penalty. The hearing was adjourned until May 9 at 16:00 (February 20th).

The fourth hearing of the case was held on May 9 at the Istanbul 2nd Criminal Court of First Instance. Veysel Ok spoke about the declaration of the periodical requested by the prosecutor’s office to determine whether bianet is a newspaper. Ok also presented the acquittal decision of Eren Keskin, who was tried for the commemoration event on April 24 (2021), which is considered the anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, and Cihan Aydın and the board members, who were tried under Article 301 for his statement on the Armenian Genocide. The court adjourned the hearing to 14:00 on July 2 to review the decisions (May 9th).

The fifth hearing of the case was held on July 2 at the Istanbul 2nd Criminal Court of First Instance. The court ruled for the acquittal of Elif Akgül and Haluk Kalafat each (July 2).