MEDIA MONITORING DATABASE
Constitutional Court – Decision on bianet
RELATED PERSON OR INSTITUTION
bianet
CITY
İstanbul
YEAR OF INTERFERENCE
2018
LAST UPDATED
21/11/2019
TYPE OF STATEMENT
Political
MEDIUM
Internet
Internet News Portal
THE TITLE OF WHOSE RIGHT IS INTERFERED
Media Outlet
RIGHTS GUARANTEED UNDER THE RIGHT OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
Right to Impart Information and Ideas
TYPE OF INTERFERENCE
Judicial Interference
Criminal Peace Judgeships
Decision to block access
THE LEGAL GROUNDS FOR INTERFERENCE
Law on Regulating Broadcasting (Publication) in the Internet and Fighting Against Crimes Committed by Means of Such Broadcasting
Art. 9

The İstanbul 7th Peace and Criminal Judgeship has abided by the verdict of the Constitutional Court, which ruled that the access block imposed on a news article published on bianet violated the freedom of expression of the website, and reversed the verdict of access block.

On December 4, 2018, the Constitutional Court has announced its verdict regarding an objection lodged against a ruling that blocked access to the news article entitled “Sıcak İş İlişkileri Değil Taciz” (Not Warm Business Relations But Harassment) published on bianet in 2006.

The Constitutional Court unanimously ruled that “the freedom of expression and press as guaranteed by the Articles 26 and 28 of the Constitution have been violated.” The court also ruled for a re-trial so that the consequences of the violation in question could be eliminated